FREE ENERGY GENERATOR BY KAPANADZE 100 KW – PART -1
THIS TEST THIRD PARTY 100 KW GENERATOR LOW LOAD TEST .
ANOTHER TEST FULL POWER AND 100 KW / ENERGY QUALITY TESTED BY FLUKE POWER ANALIZER.
Duration : 0:3:16
FREE ENERGY GENERATOR BY KAPANADZE 100 KW – PART -1
25 Responses
Leave a Comment
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
im glad it has a …
im glad it has a jacobs ladder. otherwise i might think its fake…………….
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
I’ve read the …
I’ve read the patent and my thought is that a high frequency AC current (easy to produce) is being put through a caduceus coil which would produce a lot of scalar magnetic waves. These waves are not measurable with conventional instruments. I will be trying this soon…I just have to wind some pick-up coils to get an AC current from my Bedini setup. If something interesting happens I will definately be making a video. The trick is the caduceus coil…2 intertwined snakes with the tails connected
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
I can understand, …
I can understand, that there could be transfer of energy from one couil to another by magnetic field caused by alternating current flowing through it. But where does the additional energy come from? What kind of additional energy is taken “from the air” and transformed to electrical? Is it heat of that surrounding air or does it come from space? If the second, using such energy for usual applications, like lights, motors or boilers will only result in another source of atmosphere warming.
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
Ptent # …
Ptent # WO2008103129A1, google it! stop your BS comments!
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
And when your site …
And when your site earns tmzenerji????
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
The point is just …
The point is just that there isn’t any way to really _prove_ these claims over the interwebs. The only proof, I could see, would be to physically go there and examine the device.
Failing that, provide a small-scale working model. If it produces even only a few watts, that’s still free energy.
Failing THAT, provide EXACT plans for reproducing this machine or a small model, that is, leaving no detail omitted.
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
The real test for a …
The real test for a free energy machine is to hook the out to the in and see if it powers itself, and if one doesn’t want to do that, if the Watts (W) going in from conventional sources of energy are smaller than the Watts (W) going out. And if hooking out to in, put a load on there too, and see if it can generate enough to power the load and itself at the same time.
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
I didn’t make any …
I didn’t make any proposal or theory for a device, so I’m not sure what you mean by “me” being “real” or “fake”. All I’m pointing out is that these videos do not prove or provide useful evidence for anything, because it is easy to fake them, and they cannot be easily tested to determine their veracity. It is also not possible to really see if the machine is actually providing results or deluding the “inventor” (this is often the case more than deliberate hoaxes).
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
o k ?????????
o k ?????????
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
or may not get you …
or may not get you there. You can be real and fake mr mike . really. we are a not company at holywood and we not theater . Where the idea of this tool soon everyone using . your these ideas insert your Where ? hehh heee…….. see again
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
Капанадзе молодец ! …
Капанадзе молодец !!! Нарисуй схему пусть все пользуются. По больше бы таких людей.
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
tesla coil !!! …
tesla coil !!! that’s all ??? where is the free energy ???
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
Hmm. You say ” …
Hmm. You say “potential fields accelerate the charges”. So does a particle accelerator. So wouldn’t the “effect” show up in experiments done with a particle accelerator? And there’s been oodles of those done….
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
Note the “you” in …
Note the “you” in the last bit is more generic than _you_ specifically. It also applies if you didn’t invent the machine, too, but still had special “knowledge” of it.
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
Where do you manage …
Where do you manage to get this knowledge from? If it’s extremely complex then of course you’d have to “start from the beginning”, no? I mean, if you have a machine you invent, and you’re the only one who knows about it, then to tell someone else about it you have to start from the beginning, no?
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
Hey sorry I didn’t …
Hey sorry I didn’t mean to be a smartypants, it’s just that there always seems to be a huge gap between those who have some knowledge of these inventions and those who don’t, and after some time that makes me frustrated. Its hard trying to share ideas when we have to start at the beginning for every time.
First of you’re right, video is never a good evidence on its own.
If I’m not completely of track here the spark seems to be the essential ingredient. Potential fields accelerates the charges.
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
I read it again, …
I read it again, you said “this is big” not “A” big… sorry… oops…
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
A big what? You …
A big what? You said, “This is a *big*”.
No, I don’t know what’s going on here, as I cannot go to the place to investigate. But I do know that this video is not evidence of any significant weight of free energy. Does that mean that there was no free energy here? No, it doesn’t. It means this video does not support the claim that there was. OK?
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
Conclusion; you …
Conclusion; you don’t know what’s going on here, but some of us do. This is *big*
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
Videos prove …
Videos prove absolutely nothing. Because ANYTHING and EVERYTHING in them can be faked. Anything there could be rigged — the sparkers, the dials, you name it. The whole thing could be staged and nobody here could tell. Movies are made all the time that look like they could be real but of course we know they aren’t. So videos do not prove anything at all, really.
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
The last time I …
The last time I checked, arcing was a bad thing in any electrical apparatus with the exception of some kind of toy or weapon (Jacob’s ladder or stun gun). All conspiracy theories aside, good luck getting the NEC changed to allow arcing as an integral part of a generator.
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
congratulations! I …
congratulations! I ca not wait to see part-2
(Can capacitive coupling of two tesla transformers be effective like this?)
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
yup I will believe …
yup I will believe it when I can buy it at walmart
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
this technology …
this technology will be blackshelved it doesn t obey the aws of conservation of energy . It produces lmore energy then in
Bad news for energy companies who make money selling energy.
watch your backs guys
April 24th, 2010 at 11:59 pm
Frankly, this could …
Frankly, this could be anything. It looks like some Tesla coils running with some analog instrumentation and wires on the floor.
Let the inventor hook his free energy machine to a motor with a load and lets see how that works.